wewillwewill: (Elidibus-BAcknowledge)
wewillwewill ([personal profile] wewillwewill) wrote in [community profile] voidtreckernet2022-02-25 03:54 pm
Entry tags:

poi 28 - Audio Only

[For those listening keenly a note of obvious exhaustion may be heard behind Elidibus's words. Nevertheless he keeps a calm, clear tone throughout his communication.]

In the wake of the Voidtrecker Express's announcement, I would like to speak in support of its request and efforts.

Despite our personal feelings about our plight, it has sought to try and send those of us who wished to return home back to our worlds. Given the uncertain nature of our tethers and the amount of aether such an endeavor must have cost it, it heeded our will.

It should not be the target of blame for not succeeding, nor that others may have been accidentally caught in its efforts despite their desire to remain.

The Voidtrecker Express did not choose to send a select few to see if it were possible but instead attempted to aid all of us fairly. And we accepted that offer despite the possible consequences. There could have been much more dire outcome for such a monumental effort, including our tethers being strained to the point of breaking, leaving us at the mercy of voidspace or the destruction of the train itself and with it, the loss of those who chose to stay.

Pray speak if you feel differently about whether the Voidtrecker Express is to blame. But I also ask you try not to dwell overlong on fault. Rest and recover and take what you can from this experience. This is not the end of our journey.
stonefvced: (o14.)

audio

[personal profile] stonefvced 2022-02-26 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
Where do you obtain your information about the Express' intentions from?
stonefvced: (Default)

[personal profile] stonefvced 2022-02-26 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
I'm asking you. You speak as if you understand what this train intended to do, assuming you didn't merely choose to repeat its original message prior.
stonefvced: (oo8.)

[personal profile] stonefvced 2022-02-26 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
There are very few observable facts at this time. We do not yet know why we were offered the return home, whether it was experimental or not--we only know that we were offered to return home, and can infer from the information previously given to us about the tethers that the process may have been dangerous.

We do not know why it went wrong, what went wrong, or whether the express did in fact make a clear or calculated effort. We do know that fixing the error took a toll on it and that it intended to return people to their worlds.

Until it can and is willing to speak on its own behalf, it's dangerous to confuse theory with fact. Further, and more personal, informing people who have suffered that they could have suffered worse is a poor choice.
stonefvced: (oo7.)

[personal profile] stonefvced 2022-02-26 12:32 pm (UTC)(link)
( Hm. Interesting response. He takes some time to consider his words and what he will address. )

You said you speak from observable fact. I challenged that there were very few observable facts available, listing several unknowns. It was not an accusation of you speaking that which I listed.

You needn't apologize to me. It's merely, this invalidates people's experiences. A thought to keep in mind for next time. ( Or don't, whatever, he just had to say something. He saw first hand how this affected others. )

As for the train itself, whether we choose to pursue understanding the deeper purpose of their offering should there have been any and the technical aspects of what went wrong, accountability is required.
stonefvced: (Default)

[personal profile] stonefvced 2022-03-06 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Correct. ( And for the other matter: ) I said nothing about your facts being invalid. I questioned from where they came.

( But he'll depart from this before it had the potential to be circular. ) True, and in that accountability comes the accountability owed to us by the train.